Monday 21 September 2015

Landscape Architecture and Architecture Associations: the past, present and future

Landscape Architecture & Architecture  Associations:

 the past, present and future 

                   



00  Introduction

The following study discusses the importance of critically considering the relationship between the fields and approach of Landscape Architecture and Architecture over time; the past, present and future of both. Evaluating the history of each and where each may or may not have been considered more important in comparison to the other is significant in understanding where the two fields are headed in the future. Throughout history, Architecture and Landscape Architecture methods have evolved in relation to one another in response to critical thinkers of the time and key projects signify this complex evolutionary relationship.






01 Thinking Critically

There is certainly much in contemporary culture and  landscape that we ought to be skeptical about…
                                                           -  James Corner

. Modern criticism has become removed from real life. Rather than being imposed, skepticism should emerge from discontent and unfulfillment, and involves reflection with the formulation of alternatives and possibilities. 
. Critical thinking in Landscape Architecture projects a richness of associations and previously unforseen relationships.
. Landscape Architecture is a strategic phenomenon where we critically cultivate our relationship to landscape; searching for itself and its future.




02  Scenic  /  17th Century


                                                                        
 The scenic approach to Landscape Architecture characterized the conception of picturesque settings; where Landscape and Architecture existed together in a cultural context and human interaction.

 Claude Lorrain, one of the prominent French landscape painters never ceased to include castles, towns, and inhabited places in his panoramic paintings; where,if the ocean horizon is represented, it is from the setting of a busy port.                                                        

Village Fete  /  Claude Lorrain  / 1639   
                                            
               

      The Versailles Gardens of the French Renaissance emphasize the significance of Landscape as a powerful scenic element. Architectural elements are included within the Landscape as subsequent components.
    
                                        
Versailles Gardens  /  1660-70s





03  Industrial  / 19th Century


Crystal Palace / 1850s




   With the Industrial Revolution and breakthrough in engineering technology, Architects' main approach was to utilize new technology with materials such as steel and glass. Although the vast greenhouses popular at the time contained thousands of plants, the glory of the Architecture was predominant.
     As can be seen from the picture, landscapes became secondary to the overshadowing building. Using plants as ornaments popularized the garden design approach beginning during this period.



 
Tadao Ando / 4x4 square / 2003






        Tadao Ando's 4x4 square buildings stand out in the landscape as forms with no context.












 The trend of venerating Architecture and its forms developed and continued into modern times. Modernistic Architecture common in the 19th and 20th Century  became a field that treats compositions spatially, works from the abstract to the real, and thus introduces built elements regardless of the context. While landscape is all about evolving systems, the best way to treat such systems is to work from the real to the abstract.


 The understanding of Landscape began to drift away from what is scenic, being used with more freedom during the 1800s by connecting it to its settings and functions (time, place, and mood); thus, the terms townscape, cityscape, roadscape arose. Using the “scape” to signify a system of spaces helped explain how “landscapes” are spaces being synthesized according to the surrounding social attitudes.

 Contradiction in Architecture and Landscape consequently urged the need to find a unified methodology that treats spaces holistically was raised; resulting in the emergence of field of Landscape Architecture. 




04  Skeptic  /  20th Century


The word landscape architecture emerged with contributions from Gilbert Laing Meason and Frederick Law Olmstead  in 1863, followed by the establishment of American Society of Landscape Architects in 1899.

As can be seen in projects throughout the 20th century, Landscape Architecture began evolving in its theories and slowly gained popularity. The field generally remained disconnected from Architecture, and was viewed as an added  decorative layer to architectural features; complementing or emphasizing them. The undermining of Landscape Architecture disregarded the field's fundamental principles of connecting people to their land; expressing culture and history in every context. Since the establishment of the profession, paradoxical approaches have been adapted, each understanding the function of Landscape Architecture from a different perspective.


‘’Landscape architecture today embraces a diversity of schools and approaches, with the ecological approach at one end and the strictly formalistic one at the other.’’ 
                                                                                                            - Jala Makhzoumi



                       Central Park / Frederick Law Olmstead / 1857




Mies van der Rohe/ Farnsworth House / 1951


 "Nature, too, shall live its own life. We must beware not to disrupt it with the color of our houses and interior fittings. Yet we should attempt to bring nature, houses, and human beings together into a higher unity. If you view nature through the glass walls of the Farnsworth House, it gains a more profound significance than if viewed from outside. That way more is said about nature–it becomes a part of a larger whole."
                            – Mies van der Rohe






05  Holistic  /  21st Century

With environmental awareness popularization in the 1960s-70s, the methodology of Landscape Ecology was developed in consistence with a holistic approach to Landscape Architecture. Landscape ecology and the holistic approach necessitate viewing the landscape as a system with interconnected layers; the environment, the people, the culture and the context. Designing projects where all elements including Architecture contributing to the greater fabric of the landscape in a sustainable conscious outlook has taken the front line in today's design approach.



      













     

     Giant Interactive Group Headquarters / 2011

    The building has a low pleated roof which acts as a connector between the river and the wetland. With several functions from industrial, residential and a public park, the building employs multifaceted layers. The blend of Architecture and Landscape renders it indistinguishable from the its surroundings. The entire roof is planted with “prairie blend” species giving it a natural ambiance right in the middle of the urban environment; taking into consideration both “the corporate environment and the local ecology” 





    
















     California Academy of Science / 2008

              The  California Academy of Science complex is a living system, built to make use of its environment. Its “Living Roof” has several domes of different sizes at the center. Photo-voltaic cells are contained between the two glass panels that form the transparent canopy around the perimeter of the roof. Theses panels open and close automatically for ventilation. The moisture of the soil creates a micro-climate reducing the need of air-conditioning at the ground floor, is open to the public and facades where offices are located. The design takes into account natural lighting and positioned the spaces accordingly. This approach utilizes both Architecture and Landscape Architecture to create an environmentally synthesized and self sustainable system.



   06 The Future



   



   Will the lines between Landscape Architecture and Landscape Architecture continue to be blurred in an effort to create holistic systems? How will the relationship between Architecture and Landscape Architecture evolve from here?



   "Critical thinking is simply that which acknowledges such difficulties and keeps the questions  alive..."




      


     References


    Corner, James, and Alison Bick Hirsch. The Landscape Imagination: Collected Essays of      James Corner, 1990-2010. Web.

    Makhzoumi, Jaleh. Landscape in the Middle East: an inquiry. Landscape Research, Vol.        27, No. 3, 213–228, 2002. Web.

    Swaffield, Simon R. Theory in Landscape Architecture: A Reader. Philadelpia: U of              Pennsylvania, 2002. Print.


   

    Contemporary Issues in Landscape Architecture

     Rim Hazimeh
     Raya Rizk
     Joanna Sabra
     21 / 9 / 2015










       















Sunday 20 September 2015

THE ROLE OF CONTEXT IN  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE  DECISION MAKING



CINDY HOUEIS          N ATHALIE ESTEPHAN    RAZANE HANNA    TINA EL MOHEB



   IS  IT   NECESSARY FOR  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE PROJECT TO  BE CONTEXTUALIZED IN  ORDER TO  BE LABELLED SUCCESSFUL?


CONTEXTUAL APPROACH: 

THE WAY IN WHICH PEOPLE - ANYWHERE, EVERYWHERE UNDERSTAND AND  ENGAGE WITH THEIR WORLD WOULD DEPEND UPON THE SPECIFIC TIME AND PLACE AND HISTORICAL  CONDITIONS


CONCEPT IMPOSED APPROACH: 

DESIGN APPROACH BASED ON THE CREATION OF A PROJECT THROUGH  IDEAS, THOUGHTS, PERSONALITY,  IMPRESSIONS, ABSTRACT FORMS AND SHAPES... WHICH IS THEN APPLIED  TO A CERTAIN SITE WHERE THE DESIGNER HAS THE OPPORTUNITY TO T EST HIS CONCEPT

CONTEXTUAL  APPROACH

«MAKING OF DESIGN LANDSCAPES IS A PRIMARY FORM OF CRITICAL ACTION IN SOCIETY, ‹EMBODYING CRITICAL REFLECTION ON, A VALUE JUDGEMENT OF THE INHERITANCE AND CONTEXT TO WHICH PERTAIN.  WORKS IN THE LANDSCAPE ARE SITUATED IN BOTH SPACE, TIME AND TRADITION, AND INEVITABLY BECOME  THE SITE OF FUTURE REFLECTION AND EXPOSITION›».
- JAMES CORNER, CRITICAL THINKING (    1991 )



“ A     CONTEXTUALIZED CONCEPT IMPLIES SITUATING LANDSCAPE WITHIN THE GEOGRAPHICAL ENVIRONMENTAL, CULTURAL AND POLITICAL FRAMEWORK .”

-JALA MAKHZOUM I,      LANDSCAPE IN THE MIDDLE EAS T:       AN INQUIRY   2002 )


RESPOND TO THE NEEDS OF THE SITE
DESIGN DEPENDING ON SITE CONDITIONS, NOT TABULA RASA PHASES :
_ SITE SPECIFIC AND CONTEXTUAL KNOWLEDGE 
                   NARRATIVE AND HISTORY OF A SITE  CULTURAL AND SOCIAL ASPECT
ECO LOGICAL AND HYDRO LOGICAL ASPECT  LANDSCAPE TYPOLOGY
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS: CLIMATE AND TOPOGRAPHY
_ ANALYTICAL AND INTERPRETIVE THINKING
_ CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
_ D ESIGN DEVE LOPMENT


                 

CASE  STUDY-Club  Med  Restoration  by  EMF  Capes  de  Creus,  Spain

                     

                      










CASE  STUD Y-Moses  Bridge  by  ROAD  Architects  Halsteren,  Holland





CONCEPT  IMPOSED  APPROACH



« THE SECOND MODEL, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE AS AR T, HAD EMERGED FROM THE TEACHINGS AND  PRACTICE OF EDUCATORS SUCH AS PETER WALKER WHO WERE CONCERNED TH AT THE DESIGN PROCESS  HAD  BECOME  TO ANALYSES—ECO LOGICAL ,                                   SOCIAL, AND BEHAVIORAL —TH AT THE ART OF  MAKING THE  LANDSCAPE VISIBLE, BEAUTIFUL, AND  HAD BEEN MADE SUBSERVIENT TO THE  LANDSCAPE’ S FUNCTION».

- MICHEL CONAN, ENVIRONMENTALISM IN  LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE (    2000 )


“INSTEAD OF A STYLE THAT MATURED FROM CERTAIN REGIONAL OR CULTURAL TRADITIONS, THE PRODUCT LINE OF THE GLOBAL DO- I T- YOURSELF CHAINS IS NOW A MAIN INFLUENCE ON THE APPEARANCE  OF THE LANDSCAPE. ALL THIS LEADS TO A TAL LANDSCAPE’ IN CONTINUOUS CHANGE: “… INSTEAD,  WE FIND  LOOSENING- UP A CULTURAL DE- CENTRALIZ ATION WHERE  STABLE CAN BE  BUI LT.
-MARTIN  ,                                                                                       DE  LANDSCAPE  AS EVO LUTIONARY SYSTEMS



CASE  STUDY- The  Red  Gar  den  by  Vladimir  Sitta  Sydney Australia




CASE  STUD Y-MoMA  Roof  Gar  den  by Ken  Smith  |     New  York,  USA





REFERENC E S


Critical Thinking. (1991).  Landscape Journal, 10(2),  159-162.  Retrieved September 21,     2015.
Makhzoumi, J. (2002). Landscape in the Middle East: An inquiry. 27(3), 213-228. Retrieved Sep-  tember 21,  2015.
Hines, S. (2005, November 1). LAM Feature 3. Retrieved September 21, from https://www.  asla.org/lamag/lam05/november/feature3.html
Meyer, E. (2000). The Post–Earth Day Conundrum:Translating EnvironmentalValues into Land-  scape Design. Environmentalism in  Landscape Architecture, 22,   187-224.
Beardsley, John. “A  Word for  Landscape Architecture.”  Harvard Design Magazine 2000.  Print.
Elizabeth K. Meyer. “The Expanded Field of Landscape Architecture.” In Ecological Design and  Planning, edited by George F. Thompson and Frederick R. Steiner, 45–79. New York: John ley     Sons, Inc.,  1997. Excerpt from  167-170.
Elizabeth K. Meyer. “The Expanded Field of Landscape Architecture.” In Ecological Design and  Planning, edited by George F. Thompson and Frederick R. Steiner, 45–79. New York: John ley     Sons, Inc.,  1997. Excerpt from  167-170.

Prominksi, Martin. “Designing Landscape as an Evolutionary System.” The Design Journal B.3:  25-34. Print.